Archive for the ‘Writing Tips’ Category

The Big Red Word vs. the Little Green Man by Julia Turner

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

This article proves that Exit signs need editing too…  and that sometimes even the most effective language is not enough to convey an important message.  The Big Red Word vs. the Little Green Man 

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Why it’s Important to Write Right in the Legal Profession – And 5 Common Writing Pitfalls to Avoid

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

The following article, by Brenda Bernstein, was first published on MyLegal.com.

This past September, a federal judge in Florida denied a lawyer’s motion (without prejudice, so he can re-file the motion) stating that it was “riddled with unprofessional grammatical and typographical errors that nearly render the entire motion incomprehensible.” Click here for the full article.

The judge highlighted the following problems, among others:

• Incorrect use of apostrophes.

• Typographical errors (using the word “this” instead of “thus” and the word “full” instead of “for”).

• Incorrect placement of periods and commas outside of quotation marks.

• Wrong word use (using the phrase the plaintiff “had attended on filing” this action, instead of saying the plaintiff had “intended” to file an action).

• One very long sentence.

Don’t let this happen to you!

If you write legal documents in any way, shape or form, it is absolutely essential to use correct spelling and grammar. In a famous case in England, a traffic ticket was thrown out because it was issued for illegal “stoping” instead of “stopping”; the alleged perpetrator had conducted no mining activities (“stoping” is a mining term) and so was found not guilty. I bet that police officer never issued another “stoping” ticket.

Past or Present?

One extremely common error I see amongst law students is using the word “lead” to mean the past tense of “lead.” This mistake could get you in trouble, since the past tense of “lead” is “led” (with no a). You could be writing in the wrong tense!

Example or Complete List?

Another place you can easily convey the wrong meaning is with “i.e.” and “e.g.” When you use “i.e.” it means “that is” or “in other words.” The proper way to follow “i.e.” is with a definition or complete list. For example: The defendant was charged with illegal stoping, i.e., mining activity. “E.g.” means “for example.” The proper way to follow “e.g.” is with a partial list of possibilities. For example: The motion was denied for bad grammar, e.g., typographical errors and wrong word use. If “i.e.” were used here, we would need to provide a complete list of the examples of bad grammar.

Law or Liberty?

Do you know the difference between a statute and a statue? Statutes are laws. Statues are sculptures. We have statutes of limitations and a Statue of Liberty. Don’t get these confused. You might want to remember the extra “t” for “time” when it’s a statute of limitations, or for “text” when it’s any written law. And you might think of following those statutes to a “T” (or 3)!

Proper Punctuation: Periods and Commas Inside Quotation Marks

To touch on one of the Florida judge’s beefs, periods and commas, in the United States, always go inside quotation marks, even when they are not part of the quotation, e.g., The defendant was arrested for “illegal stoping.” Although there are rare exceptions to this rule, they will probably not appear in legal writing (they are more likely to show up in technical writing). For a detailed discussion of this issue, see my blog posting.

Proper Punctuation: Apostrophes

Many people incorrectly use apostrophes to make plural words. Don’t do it! Did you notice that the plural of apostrophe is NOT “apostrophe’s”? It is “apostrophes”! The plural words lawyers, judges, laws, statutes, DUIs and the 1990s do NOT take apostrophes.

Use an apostrophe “s” to make a singular possessive. The lawyer’s brief was riddled with errors. The judge’s ruling was final.

Use an “s” apostrophe to make a plural possessive. The five lawyers’ arguments diverged widely. All the county judges’ courtrooms contain the latest in audio-visual equipment.

Put your apostrophes in the right place – and avoid annoying the judge.

So Many Chances to Err!

There are multiple ways to make writing errors in legal documents, and I have only covered a few. My most important advice is to proofread and proofread again! Get a second pair of eyes to check your work. If you have grammar questions you want answered, I will answer them to the best of my ability in the comments section of this blog. I look forward to hearing from you…

Happy writing!

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Whether (or Not) – from the Columbia Journalism Review

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Does “whether” stand on its own or does it need “or not” for its full expression?  Whether you think it’s the former or the latter, you will enjoy this explanation from Evan Jenkins of the Columbia Journalism Review.  Whether (or Not)

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Commas and Semicolons… The Comma (or Semicolon?) Chameleon – by Brenda Bernstein

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

I wrote this article for Sam Diener’s Stuff for Success at his request.  I hope my tips clear up some of the confusion about those pesky commas and semicolons!  Comma (or Semicolon?) Chameleon

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Nine Great Grammar Sites – by Peter Faur

Friday, February 12th, 2010

I write about grammar as often as I can, but it will be quite a while before I cover every topic there is to cover.  Here are some resources that will help you in the meantime!  Nine Great Grammar Sites

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Can You Right Write? 10 MORE Common Writing Mistakes 2 Avoid

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Here’s Part II of my run-down of some common writing errors, posted in Sam Diener’s “Stuff for Success” blog. Read here about how to properly use affect/effect, who/that, less/fewer, and more!  10 MORE Common Writing Mistakes 2 Avoid

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Crash Blossoms – from the NYT

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Ben Zimmer from the New York Times examines ambiguous language through some interestingly worded headlines.  When you’re writing anything, watch out for your own potential “crash blossoms.”  Crash Blossoms – from the NYT

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Can You Right Write? 10 Common Writing Mistakes to Avoid

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

I wrote this article for Sam Diener’s “Stuff for Success” blog.  I cover common errors and tips on how to get them write (umm… I mean right).  Check it out here:  Can You Right Write?

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Last week I wrote an article about quotation marks, and I did not cover the topic of their overuse.  Quotation marks are often used to “emphasize” a word when they are grammatically unnecessary or incorrect.  Thankfully, another blogger has taken on the gallant task of locating errant quotation marks so that I can take a rest on this one.  I just had to share!  the “blog” of “unnecessary” quotation marks

Also note:  Using ’single’ quotation marks is also not grammatically correct, unless you are quoting something within a quote.  For instance:  Grandma always used to say, “I live every day by the words, ‘A stitch in time saves nine.’”  Single quotation marks simply don’t belong anywhere else.

And thus concludes Part 2 of the Quotation Mark Quandary.

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

Loose Connections – Times Topics from the NYT

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

I absolutely love this column.  This week, the main topic is “ambiguous antecedents and dangling modifiers.”  Writers make these errors frequently.  In fact, I’m inspired by this article and think I will write my next blog about a similar subject!  Loose Connections – Times Topics

Post to Twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline